组会：2026-10-19
Group meeting: 2026-10-19
按刷新模式的要求，每次刷新先把"组会卡片"放在首页最上面：像代理每天向 PI 汇报一次。本页显示最新一天（UTC 日期）的完整内容；更早的一天见组会存档。
As refresh mode requires, each refresh opens the home page with the group-meeting card: as if the agent reported to the PI once a day. This page shows the latest day (UTC date) in full; earlier days are in the meeting archive.
成果 / Results
Results
- 边缘结论重述（临时）：不扣软质子时 M31 边缘步长稳健且跨相机一致（\(+8.9\pm2.4\) % 同相机、\(+9.3\pm2.4\) % 曝光匹配，\(z\approx3.7\)）；不稳健的是它的归因——扣掉 SP 后残差取决于 SP 分解（斜率 \(-0.73\) 到 \(+0.39\) %/arcmin），自由谱形那一支最不可信。SP 分解是首要但唯一未定的系统误差，不是唯一的（相机混合本身约 7.85 个百分点）。决定性检验：R20y（多环带）与 R20z（同一天区、不同离轴角）。临时The edge conclusion restated (provisional): before any soft-proton subtraction the M31 edge step is robust and consistent across cameras (\(+8.9\pm2.4\) per cent same-camera, \(+9.3\pm2.4\) per cent exposure-matched, \(z\approx3.7\)); what is not robust is its attribution — after SP subtraction the residual depends on the SP decomposition (slope \(-0.73\) to \(+0.39\) per cent per arcmin) and the free-shape branch is the least credible. The SP decomposition is a leading but not the sole systematic, not the only one (the camera mixture alone is about 7.85 percentage points). Decisive tests: R20y (multi-annulus) and R20z (same sky, different off-axis). provisional
- R20r/R20s/R20t（已验证）：联合天空谱拟合里最大的失配项是"每相机 SP 斜率 + 断点"（\(\Delta\chi^2\ 3026\)，谱拟合统计量）；自由 SP 谱形后 QPB 标度只再买 252（原 1001）——QPB 标度不是主要缺陷。已确立R20r/R20s/R20t (verified): in the joint-sky spectral fit the largest misfit term is "per-camera SP slopes plus break" (\(\Delta\chi^2\ 3026\), a spectral-fit statistic); once SP shapes are free the QPB scale buys only 252 more (was 1001) — the QPB scale is not the main defect. established
- R20u（已验证）：角区数据既不能证明也不能否证每相机 ESAS QPB 水平；LMC 0137551401 的 7–12 keV FoV/QPB 1.48/1.52 是硬 FoV 超额（SP 类），不是 QPB 误差。已确立R20u (verified): the corner data neither certify nor refute the per-camera ESAS QPB level; LMC 0137551401's 7–12 keV FoV/QPB of 1.48/1.52 is a hard FoV excess (SP-like), not a QPB error. established
- R21 step 0 / R21-1（已验证）：MOS2 全链计时 1641 s（evselect 34 %、backscale 32 %、arfgen 17 %）；快速抽谱原型 0.09–0.12 s/区域，像素直方图与 DET 图与 SAS 逐位相同。已确立R21 step 0 / R21-1 (verified): the full MOS2 chain takes 1641 s (evselect 34 %, backscale 32 %, arfgen 17 %); the fast-extraction prototype reaches 0.09–0.12 s per region with pixel histograms and DET maps bit-identical to SAS. established
- esas v1.8.0-dev.6（已验证并提交）：112 测试 + 6 子测试通过，commit 8832d72，未 READY。已确立esas v1.8.0-dev.6 (verified and committed): 112 tests + 6 subtests pass, commit 8832d72, not READY. established
来源：Source: cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md revision 9–17，revisions 9–17, MosaicSelfCal/RESEARCH_PLAN.md R20r–R20x、R20z、R21/R21-1 行，the R20r–R20x, R20z, R21/R21-1 rows, .agent/jobs/2026-10-19-esas-dev6/REPORT.sol.md
工作 / Work
Work
- 跑了/答完：R20n（luna）、R20o（sol）、R20p（sol）、R20q（sol）、R20r（sol）、R20s（sol）、R20t（sol）、R20u（sol）、R20v（sol）、R21 step 0（codexnim）、R21-1（sol）；红队 RT-M77–RT-M84 八条全部三分派并归档；文献检索 S01–S09 完成。Ran and answered: R20n (luna), R20o (sol), R20p (sol), R20q (sol), R20r (sol), R20s (sol), R20t (sol), R20u (sol), R20v (sol), R21 step 0 (codexnim), R21-1 (sol); red teams RT-M77–RT-M84 all triaged and closed; literature searches S01–S09 done.
- 派出：R20w（sol）、R21-2（sol）、RT-M85（codexnim）、S10（luna）、手册刷新 1（Hermes，本页）。Dispatched: R20w (sol), R21-2 (sol), RT-M85 (codexnim), S10 (luna), handbook refresh 1 (Hermes, this page).
- 部署：手册发布于 https://dxc-handbook.pages.dev/（15:10 EDT，密码门）；红队 RT-M82b 复核已发布站点，11 条发现全部受理。Deployed: the handbook at https://dxc-handbook.pages.dev/ (15:10 EDT, password gate); red team RT-M82b re-checked the published site and all 11 findings were accepted.
- 工具：esas v1.8.0-dev.6 由 sol 生成、Claude 复核并提交（8832d72）；lesson promotion 完成（free-redteam §5b、free-handoff identifiability、launch.sh 占位符保护）。Tools: esas v1.8.0-dev.6 built by sol, verified and committed by Claude (8832d72); lesson promotion done (free-redteam §5b, free-handoff identifiability, launch.sh placeholder guard).
来源：Source: cognition-os/06_AGENT_LOG.md 2026-10-19 各行，the 2026-10-19 rows, cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md §3
问题 / Problems
Problems
- RT-M82（手册 vs 记录）停滞：Hermes 会话以一行裸工具调用结束、无报告 → 以新会话 RT-M82b 重派，11 条发现全部受理（本页刷新 1 逐条修复）。RT-M82 (handbook vs records) stalled: the Hermes session ended on a raw tool-call line with no report → relaunched fresh as RT-M82b; all 11 findings accepted (fixed one by one in this refresh 1).
- R20t 的归因顺序依赖（RT-M83）：1001→252 取决于归因顺序；对称归因下 QPB 仍保留 62.6 %。已把"大部分被 SP 拿走"改述为"共享、顺序依赖"。R20t's attribution is order-dependent (RT-M83): 1001→252 depends on the attribution order; under symmetric attribution QPB keeps 62.6 %. "Mostly taken by SP" is restated as "shared, order-dependent".
- R20o 的 78 % 是一个观测（RT-M79）：LMC 0137551401 占了 A→C \(\Delta\chi^2\) 973.3 中的 768.6。已按单观测驱动重述。R20o's 78 % is one observation (RT-M79): LMC 0137551401 carries 768.6 of the 973.3 A→C \(\Delta\chi^2\). Restated as single-observation driven.
- 手册自身的缺陷：用户名泄露（已删）、工具版本过期、运行状态过期、pn QPB 成因写成被否定的解释、CDFS 中位数 n 与值不一致、论文/讨论班两页是空壳（本次已补齐）。The handbook's own defects: a username leak (removed), stale tool versions, stale running statuses, the pn QPB cause written as the refuted explanation, the CDFS median's n and value inconsistent, the paper and seminar pages empty stubs (completed in this refresh).
来源：Source: cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md RT-M79/RT-M82b/RT-M83 行，the RT-M79/RT-M82b/RT-M83 rows, .agent/jobs/2026-10-19-redteam-m82b-handbook-live/REPORT.hermes.md
待 PI 决定 / For the PI
For the PI
- 论文草稿的中心贡献句已按 rev 17 改为"M31 的边缘步长是稳健的，它的归因不是"；是否进一步弱化或换角度，请 PI 确认。The paper draft's central-contribution sentence has been restated per rev 17 as "the M31 edge step is robust, its attribution is not"; whether to weaken or re-angle it further is for the PI to confirm.
- R20w 之后若边缘增亮确认不稳健，第 3 步成像的验收标准（"mosaic 看不到 vignetting"）是否要改写。If after R20w the edge brightening is confirmed not robust, whether the step-3 acceptance criterion ("mosaics show no visible vignetting") should be rewritten.
- 手册是否部署（本刷新不部署，按任务要求由 Claude 复审后部署）。Whether to deploy the handbook (this refresh does not deploy; per the brief, Claude deploys after review).
DiffuseXrayCalibration：把 XMM 的弥漫辐射测量校准到可引用
DiffuseXrayCalibration: making XMM diffuse-emission measurements quotable
XMM-Newton 的 EPIC 相机看弥漫辐射时，隔着两种仪器自身的背景：准静态粒子背景（QPB）与软质子（SP）。本项目校准 ESAS 减数据 + Sherpa 拟合这条流水线，使同一天空区域在任何观测、任何离轴角、任何 SP/QPB 状态下给出同一个答案；做不到，就给出这个差异的测量值——系统误差预算。最显眼的症状是每个指向在拼接图边缘变亮（edge brightening）。为什么要做，见为什么存在一页。
XMM-Newton's EPIC cameras see diffuse emission through two backgrounds of the instrument's own making: the quiescent particle background (QPB) and soft protons (SP). This project calibrates the pipeline that removes them — ESAS reduction plus Sherpa fitting — so that one piece of sky gives the same answer in every observation, at every off-axis angle, and under every SP/QPB state; where it cannot, it delivers the measured difference itself: a systematic budget. The visible symptom is that every pointing brightens toward the edge of a mosaic (edge brightening). Why this matters is on the why the project exists page.
这一页回答四个问题：这是什么（本段）；现在到哪里了（目标表）；什么还没解决（未解决问题表）；下一步做什么（1–4 周计划与如何用手继续）。
This page answers four questions: what this is (this paragraph); where it stands (the objectives table); what is unsolved (the open-problems table); what to do next (the 1–4 week plan and how to continue by hand).
来源：Source: cognition-os/00_AI_BRIEFING.md, cognition-os/02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md
最新骨架：一条流水线，三个考题
Latest skeleton: one pipeline, three exam steps
来源：Source: cognition-os/02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md, MosaicSelfCal/BENCHMARK.md, cognition-os/tool_iteration.md
目标表：PI 的三步目标与基准测试目标
Objectives: the PI's three-step goal and the benchmark goals
| 目标Objective | 状态Status | 当前最佳数字Best current number | 趋势Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| 第 1 步：抽谱（region + spectra）——高信噪比、低 SP、低未分辨点源/展源残差Step 1: regions and spectra — high S/N, low SP, low unresolved point/extended residual | 进行中in progress | CDFS P0：\(\tau/\bar{I}=0.246\)，\(\sigma/\bar{I}=0.245\)CDFS P0: \(\tau/\bar{I}=0.246\), \(\sigma/\bar{I}=0.245\) | → 掩膜规则已定（D012/D021），分数尚未收敛→ mask rule decided (D012/D021); score not yet converged |
| 第 2 步：拟合（fit sky 和 Src）——同一点指向内跨观测稳定；跨离轴角稳定Step 2: fit sky and Src — stable across observations of the same pointing, and across off-axis angle | 进行中in progress | M31 配对斜率跨 SP 分解横跨 \(-0.73\) 到 \(+0.91\) %/arcmin（仅 QPB \(+1.51\pm0.17\)；自由谱形 \(-0.73\pm0.29\)；时间切片颜色 \(+0.91\)；颜色先验 \(+0.01\pm0.26\)）M31 pair slope spans \(-0.73\) to \(+0.91\) per cent per arcmin across SP decompositions (QPB only \(+1.51\pm0.17\); free shape \(-0.73\pm0.29\); time-slice colour \(+0.91\); colour prior \(+0.01\pm0.26\)) | ↔ 步长本身稳健（\(+8.9\pm2.4\) %，\(z\approx3.7\)），扣 SP 后的归因随分解变号（RT-M88，临时）↔ the step itself is robust (\(+8.9\pm2.4\) per cent, \(z\approx3.7\)); only the post-SP attribution changes sign with the decomposition (RT-M88, provisional) |
| 第 3 步：成像（image，去掉 QPB 与 SP）——同指向叠加一致；不同指向拼接看不到 vignettingStep 3: images with QPB and SP removed — same-pointing stacks agree; mosaics show no visible vignetting | 未解决open | M31 平衡边缘步长跨 SP 分解横跨 \(+0.9\) 到 \(+8.0\) %（仅 QPB \(+9.86\)；自由谱形 \(+0.88\)；时间切片颜色 \(+8.0\)；颜色先验 \(+4.34\pm4.26\)）M31 balanced edge step spans \(+0.9\) to \(+8.0\) per cent across SP decompositions (QPB only \(+9.86\); free shape \(+0.88\); time-slice colour \(+8.0\); colour prior \(+4.34\pm4.26\)) | ↔ 步长同样由 SP 分解决定（R20v/R20w/R20x，均临时）↔ the step is likewise decided by the SP decomposition (R20v/R20w/R20x, all provisional) |
| 基准测试基线：同一固定天域跨 ObsID 的 \(\tau/\bar{I}\) 与离轴斜率（CDFS 与 M31）Benchmark baseline: between-ObsID \(\tau/\bar{I}\) and off-axis slope for one fixed sky cell (CDFS and M31) | 已建立established | CDFS P0：\(\tau/\bar{I}=0.246\)，斜率 \(+0.152/10'\)；M31 P0：\(\tau/\bar{I}=0.14\)，斜率 \(+0.25/10'\)CDFS P0: \(\tau/\bar{I}=0.246\), slope \(+0.152/10'\); M31 P0: \(\tau/\bar{I}=0.14\), slope \(+0.25/10'\) | → 这是待改进的基线，不是成果→ this is the baseline to improve, not a result |
| 考试集（exam v4 r240）：7 个 problem、18 个 ObsID、45 个 case 被减出来并审计Exam set (v4 r240): 7 problems, 18 ObsIDs, 45 cases reduced and audited | 完成done | 40 PASS，5 EXCLUDED，0 FAIL40 PASS, 5 EXCLUDED, 0 FAIL | → 冻结集（D020），后续分数都在它上面算→ frozen set (D020); every later score is computed on it |
| 快速抽谱（R21，PI 2026-10-19 11:23 EDT 的新目标）：对任意区域快速抽出谱与响应（RMF、ARF、QPB）Fast extraction (R21, the PI's new goal of 2026-10-19 11:23 EDT): spectra and responses (RMF, ARF, QPB) for arbitrary regions, fast | 进行中in progress | 原型 0.09–0.12 s/区域；像素直方图与 DET 图与 SAS 逐位相同；BACKSCAL 差 −1.1…+3.0 %，QPB 预测差 +25…+35 %prototype 0.09–0.12 s per region; pixel histograms and DET maps bit-identical to SAS; BACKSCAL differs −1.1…+3.0 %, QPB prediction +25…+35 % | → R21-2 逐项对齐 BACKSCAL/QPB/ARF（2026-10-19 18:09 EDT 在跑）→ R21-2 aligns BACKSCAL/QPB/ARF item by item (running since 2026-10-19 18:09 EDT) |
来源：Source: MosaicSelfCal/BENCHMARK.md, cognition-os/02_CURRENT_QUESTION.md, MosaicSelfCal/results/cdfs_pipeline_comparison_v1.csv, MosaicSelfCal/results/exam_v4_r240/SUMMARY.md, cognition-os/tool_iteration.md 趋势箭头：→ 未收敛；↔ 两个估计矛盾；"持平"= 配对区间含 0。Trend arrows: → not converged; ↔ two estimates disagree; "No significant difference" = the paired interval contains 0.
未解决的问题
Open problems
| 问题Problem | 为何重要Why it matters | 当前最佳假设Best hypothesis | 下一个检验Next test | 负责人Owner | 状态Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 边缘增亮（edge brightening）到底是 SP、QPB，还是仪器响应？Is edge brightening soft protons, the QPB, or the instrument response? | 这是 mosaics 里最显眼的失败，也是 PI 三步目标的第 3 步It is the most visible failure in mosaics and step 3 of the PI goal | 步长稳健、归因未定：不扣 SP 时 \(+8.9\pm2.4\) %（\(z\approx3.7\)）跨相机一致；扣掉后残差取决于 SP 分解（斜率 \(-0.73\) 到 \(+0.39\) %/arcmin），自由支最不可信。分解是首要但唯一未定的系统误差（相机混合本身约 7.85 pp）；QPB 标度不是独立支持的主因（R20t/R20u）The step is robust, its attribution is not: without SP subtraction \(+8.9\pm2.4\) per cent (\(z\approx3.7\)) is consistent across cameras; after subtraction the residual depends on the SP decomposition (slope \(-0.73\) to \(+0.39\) per cent per arcmin) and the free branch is the least credible. The decomposition is a leading but not the sole systematic (the camera mixture alone is about 7.85 pp); a QPB scale is not independently supported as the main cause (R20t/R20u) | R20y：8 个 M31 边缘观测的联合多环带谱拟合（SP 谱形按相机自由，各环带 SP 归一由 SP 模板 \(\times\) BACKSCAL 绑定），打破 SP 与天空的退化；R20z：同一天区在大 vs 小离轴角下的仪器固定与天空固定部分，按能段与相机分开R20y: joint multi-annulus spectral fits on the 8 M31 edge observations (SP shape free per camera, each annulus's SP normalisation tied by the SP template \(\times\) BACKSCAL) to break the SP-sky degeneracy; R20z: the instrument-fixed versus sky-fixed part of the unsubtracted edge excess on the same sky at large versus small off-axis, per band and camera | R20w | 运行中running |
| SP 在探测器上的空间分布是什么形状？What is the spatial distribution of SP across the detector? | 拟合用的模型 \( \text{rsp\_flat}(A_{\text{sky}}\cdot\text{SP}) \) 默认 SP 在探测器上是均匀的；如果不是，所有 SP 扣除都带系统误差The fit model \( \text{rsp\_flat}(A_{\text{sky}}\cdot\text{SP}) \) assumes SP is uniform across the detector; if it is not, every SP subtraction carries a systematic | 硬带（2-5 keV）里 ESAS 的 det 图最符合（原始 SP 计数每像素从 \(2'-6'\) 到 \(12'-14'\) 下降 \(0.88\pm0.13\)，ESAS 图 0.76，均匀 1.00，光子 vignetting 0.44）In the hard band (2-5 keV) the ESAS detector map fits best (raw SP counts per pixel fall \(0.88\pm0.13\) from \(2'-6'\) to \(12'-14'\); ESAS map 0.76, flat 1.00, photon vignetting 0.44) | 软带（0.4-1.25 keV，边缘增亮所在的带）目前测不到；需要在同一指向内用 SP 时间变化做示踪The soft band (0.4-1.25 keV, where the edge brightening lives) is not yet measurable; needs a time tracer of SP inside one pointing | R18b2 / R20 | 未解决open |
| MOS1/MOS2 的 SP 归一比在 2012 年发生台阶（\(0.68\to1.47\)），原因是什么？The MOS1/MOS2 SP-normalisation ratio steps in 2012 (\(0.68\to1.47\)); what causes it? | 任何跨 2012-12 合并 SP 先验或比较都是错的；这也决定了 SP 扣除能否跨年代使用Any SP prior or comparison pooled across 2012-12 is wrong, and it decides whether an SP subtraction can be used across epochs | 没有单一原因站得住：面积效应被排除；掩膜足迹、角区模板陈旧、硬带 QPB 标度都被逐一排除；自由 SP 谱形下看不到 2012 台阶（R20s：1.61\(\sigma\)）No single cause stands: the area effect is refuted; the mask footprint, stale corner templates and the hard-band QPB scale are excluded one by one; with free SP shapes no 2012 step is seen (R20s: 1.61\(\sigma\)) | R20w 的软带 SP 谱形与径向模板直接测量——它同时是 R20v 边缘数字的输入R20w's direct measurement of the soft-band SP shape and radial template — which is also the input to R20v's edge numbers | R20w | 运行中running |
| 重复指向能否测出 SP 的绝对水平？Can repeat pointings measure the absolute SP level? | SP 水平是第 3 步成像的关键输入；测不出来就无法给 SP 扣除定标The SP level is the key input to step 3; without it the SP subtraction cannot be normalised | 不能：最好的重复对（0784000101/0201，相距 \(0.04'\)）只是上限，不是零；测量受 QPB 协方差限制，不受计数限制No: the best repeat pair (0784000101/0201, \(0.04'\) apart) is an upper limit, not a null; the test is limited by the QPB covariance, not by counts | R20d/R20e：测出观测间的 QPB 协方差，再重拟这 8 个相机对R20d/R20e: measure the between-epoch QPB covariance, then refit the 8 camera pairs | R20d / R20e | 未解决open |
| pn 相机的 QPB 为什么被高估？Why is the pn camera's QPB over-normalised? | pn 目前只能做交叉检查（T01）；修不好就不能升级为主要相机pn is a cross-check only (T01); until it is fixed it cannot be promoted | 不是角区光子泄漏（OOT 只占 \(2.5\ \%\)，边缘 \(0.5\ \%\)）；更像 FWC 模板迁移，最佳修正是 FoV 12-14 keV 归一化Not corner photon leakage (OOT \(2.5\ \%\), edge \(0.5\ \%\)); likelier an FWC template transfer, best corrected by the FoV 12-14 keV normalisation | R5b：pn 减数据 + pn/MOS 联合拟合，held-out 检验 pn QPB 标度R5b: pn reduction plus joint pn/MOS fits, with a held-out test of the pn QPB scale | R5b | 检验中testing |
| 暗天区里 SP 与天空的简并如何打破？How is the SP-sky degeneracy broken in faint fields? | WCDFS 是最暗的检验场；在那里谱拟合给出的 SP 归一不可靠，成像又过度扣除WCDFS is the faintest testbed; there the spectral SP norm is unreliable and the image over-subtracts | 分组方式本身就是一个系统误差（G1 把 2-12 keV 打进一个 bin，天空差 \(18\ \%\)）；用 G2 式边界The grouping choice is itself a systematic (G1 packs 2-12 keV into one bin, moving the sky by \(18\ \%\)); use G2-style boundaries | R3c：联合似然比检验（天空共享 vs 每观测自由，SP 每观测自由）R3c: joint likelihood-ratio test (sky shared vs free per observation, SP free per observation) | R3c | 部分完成partly done |
| SAS 22.1 后端能否用于生产？Can the SAS 22.1 backend be used for production? | SAS 20 与 22.1 的 ARF 差 \(+7\) 到 \(+22\ \%\)；用错后端会让所有天空水平偏移The SAS 20 and 22.1 ARFs differ by \(+7\) to \(+22\ \%\); the wrong backend shifts every sky level | 差异可归因：ARF 来自 arfgen 开关，QPB 来自 FWC 来源 + MOS1 自建角区；但 pn 端到端与可复现性声明还没过The differences are attributable (ARF from arfgen switches, QPB from the FWC source plus MOS1's own corner), but pn end-to-end and the reproducibility statement have not passed | R15 / esas v1.8.0：pn 端到端、ANOMFL、可复现性声明，然后 PI 签字R15 / esas v1.8.0: pn end to end, ANOMFL, a reproducibility statement, then PI sign-off | R15 | 检验中testing |
来源：Source: cognition-os/REDTEAM_QUEUE.md, MosaicSelfCal/RESEARCH_PLAN.md, cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md
未来 1–4 周
The next 1–4 weeks
计划顺序照 MosaicSelfCal/RESEARCH_PLAN.md 的 SP 路线图（PI 2026-10-17）与 cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md §7 的建议方向。每条后面是它要回答的问题。
The order follows the SP roadmap in MosaicSelfCal/RESEARCH_PLAN.md (PI 2026-10-17) and the proposed directions in cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md §7. Each item names the question it answers.
| 时间When | 做什么What | 回答什么问题Question answered | 状态State |
|---|---|---|---|
| 现在进行in flight | R20w 软带 SP 谱形时间切片（sol）；R21-2 快速抽谱对齐（sol）；RT-M85 红队复核 R20v（codexnim）；S10 文献检索（luna）R20w soft-band SP shape from time slices (sol); R21-2 fast-extractor parity (sol); RT-M85 red team re-checking R20v (codexnim); S10 literature search (luna) | 软带 SP 谱形能否直接测出、并盲预测 R20v 的边缘数字；快速抽谱能否逐项对齐 SAS；R20v 的"边缘增亮不稳健"是否站得住Can the soft-band SP shape be measured directly and blind-predict R20v's edge numbers; can the fast extractor reach item-by-item parity with SAS; does R20v's "edge brightening not robust" stand | 运行中running |
| 接下来next | R20 家族收尾：用 R20w 测得的（或已标定的）SP 谱形重做边缘增亮拟合，并把 SP 水平、QPB 协方差、SP 模板合并成每观测 SP 产品Close the R20 family: redo the edge-brightening fits with the SP shape measured (or calibrated) by R20w, and merge the SP level, QPB covariance and SP template into one per-observation SP product | 边缘增亮中有多少是 SP，多少是仪器；SP 扣除能否标准化How much of the edge brightening is SP and how much instrument; can the SP subtraction be standardised | 待定pending |
| 并行in parallel | R21 快速抽谱家族（step 0 完成，R21-1 原型完成，R21-2 对齐在跑）；R5b pn 减数据与联合拟合；R15 / esas v1.8.0 READY 门the R21 fast-extraction family (step 0 done, R21-1 prototype done, R21-2 parity running); R5b pn reduction and joint fits; the R15 / esas v1.8.0 READY gate | 任意区域快速抽谱（PI 当前目标）；pn 能否成为第二台主相机；SAS 22.1 能否用于生产fast spectra for arbitrary regions (the PI's current goal); can pn become a second primary camera; can SAS 22.1 be used for production | 运行中running |
| 2–4 周2–4 weeks | 工具发布：edgestep 包、xsherpa SP 响应、esas SP 成像模板；然后 DXC 用固定版本重测Tool releases: the edgestep package, the xsherpa SP response, the ESAS SP image template; then a DXC re-test pinned to the version | 修正能否落到工具里并被独立复现Whether the fixes land in the tools and are independently reproduced | 待定pending |
| 验收标准acceptance | 高 SP / 低 SP 时间桶给同一面亮度；M31/LMC/WCDFS 配对斜率归零；mosaic 看不到 vignettingHigh- and low-SP time bins of one pointing give the same surface brightness; M31/LMC/WCDFS pair slopes zero; mosaics show no visible vignetting | PI 三步目标是否达成Whether the PI's three-step goal is met | 未达成not met |
来源：Source: MosaicSelfCal/RESEARCH_PLAN.md, cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md, cognition-os/tool_iteration.md
本次更新 / 数据截至
What's new / Data as of
本次更新What's new
2026-10-19 21:40 EDT：刷新 1（H-DXC-1r1）+ 复核修正 1 + 复核修正 2。修掉红队 RT-M82b 的全部 11 条发现（含用户名泄露、过期的工具版本与运行状态、pn QPB 成因表述、CDFS 中位数计数），把内容推进到 cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md revision 16，并按复核意见 1 重述了边缘结论与论文/报告的中心贡献：
2026-10-19 21:40 EDT: refresh 1 (H-DXC-1r1) + review fix 1 + review fix 2.All 11 findings of red team RT-M82b are fixed (including a username leak, stale tool versions and running statuses, the pn QPB cause wording, the CDFS median count), the content is brought up to cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md revision 16, and per review fix 1 the edge conclusion and the central contribution of the paper and talk are restated:
- R20v（临时）：自由每相机 SP 谱形下，M31 边缘斜率 +1.51 → −0.73 %/arcmin、步长 +9.9 → +0.9 %——边缘增亮不是稳健检测，取决于 SP 分解；R20v (provisional): with per-camera free SP shapes the M31 edge slope goes +1.51 → −0.73 %/arcmin and the step +9.9 → +0.9 % — edge brightening is not a robust detection; it depends on the SP decomposition;
- R20r/R20s/R20t：主失配源是冻结的 SP 谱形（\(\Delta\chi^2\ 3026\)），不是相机天空因子或 QPB 标度；QPB 标度未被独立支持（R20u：角区数据不背书）；R20r/R20s/R20t: the main misfit is the frozen SP spectral shape (\(\Delta\chi^2\ 3026\)), not the camera sky factor or the QPB scale; the QPB scale is not independently supported (R20u: the corner data do not back it);
- R21（PI 的新目标）：快速抽谱——step 0 计时画像完成，R21-1 原型 0.09–0.12 s/区域，R21-2 逐项对齐在跑；R21 (the PI's new goal): fast extraction — step 0's timing profile done, the R21-1 prototype at 0.09–0.12 s per region, R21-2 item-by-item parity running;
- 论文草稿补齐 §3.3–§5、参考文献与来源映射；讨论班幻灯片首次写全（45 分钟 + 问答）；the paper draft is completed through §3.3–§5 with references and the source map; the seminar deck is written in full for the first time (45 min + questions);
- esas v1.8.0-dev.6（112 测试 + 6 子测试，commit 8832d72，未 READY）。esas v1.8.0-dev.6 (112 tests + 6 subtests, commit 8832d72, not READY).
本页所有数字取自下方列出的记录文件；没有一项是本手册自己算出来的。
Every number on this page is read from the record files listed below; none is computed by this handbook.
数据截至Data as of
项目状态：2026-10-19 21:40 EDT（cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md revision 17）。
Project state: 2026-10-19 21:40 EDT (cognition-os/08_RUNNING.md revision 17).
本手册读到的最新科学记录：2026-10-19 21:40 EDT（rev 17：不扣软质子时 M31 边缘步长稳健且跨相机一致 \(+8.9\pm2.4\) %，\(z\approx3.7\)；不稳健的是它的归因，SP 分解是首要但唯一未定的系统误差；R20y/R20z 是决定性检验）。
The newest science record this handbook read: 2026-10-19 21:40 EDT (rev 17: before any SP subtraction the M31 edge step is robust and camera-consistent at \(+8.9\pm2.4\) per cent, \(z\approx3.7\); what is not robust is its attribution, and the SP decomposition is a leading but not the sole systematic; R20y/R20z are the decisive tests).
更晚的记录（评审、决定、新结果）以它们为准；本页在下次刷新时更新。
Later records (reviews, decisions, new results) take precedence; this page is updated at the next refresh.